Council Brief
Fountain Valley · City Council · Tuesday, September 1, 2026

What Fountain Valley is about to decide

The council meets Tuesday in the Council Chambers, 10200 Slater Avenue — closed session at 3:30 PM, study session at 4:30 PM, regular meeting at 6:00 PM — sitting also as the Successor Agency and the Housing Authority. These are pending decisions from the posted agenda — not outcomes. Every item links to the official record.

Source: official agenda packet (PDF) · meeting page · Next regular meeting: September 15, 2026, 6:00 PM

✅ What actually passed (per the draft minutes): The city’s draft minutes of the September 1 meeting — printed on pages 79–85 of the September 15 agenda packet, and received and filed 5–0 at that September 15 meeting according to its own draft minutes — record all five members present (Bui, Constantine, Grandis, Vice Mayor Harper and Mayor Cunneen). Consent Items 1 through 5 each passed 5–0 on a motion by Constantine, seconded by Harper: the $19,918.42 Municipal Water District of Orange County Addendum 3E, the one-year Cintas Corporation extension, the August 6–19 register of demands, the August 18 minutes (received and filed “as amended”), and the Baker Tilly Advisory Group amendment adding $2,650. After a public hearing with no speakers, the council introduced the purchasing ordinance revising Municipal Code Chapters 2.36 and 2.38 and repealing Resolution No. 9900 on first reading, 5–0 (Constantine/Grandis); per the September 15 draft minutes it was adopted on second reading at that meeting, also 5–0. Both closed-session items — the HCD letter regarding the group homes ordinance and the 17565 Los Alamos St. negotiation with the Boys and Girls Club — ended with no reportable action. Under council items for future consideration, Council Member Constantine’s requests to move ahead right away with the planned survey and for an ordinance barring campaigning on city property drew no second (the minutes add that the attorney for the city would brief the council); a request for a study-session overview of temporary campaign signs was seconded by Mayor Cunneen. The meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. We will update this page if the council amends the minutes.
The headline: the lone public hearing is a rewrite of the city's purchasing rules. The council will consider first reading of an ordinance repealing and re-enacting Municipal Code Chapters 2.36 and 2.38 — raising the direct-purchase limit from $3,500 to $10,000, the formal-procurement threshold from $50,000 to $100,000, the no-solicitation ceiling for professional services from $50,000 to $100,000, and the CUPCCAA public-works limits to $75,000 (negotiated) and $220,000 (informal bidding) — while folding the City Manager's IT purchasing authority from Resolution No. 9900 into the code. Staff reports no direct fiscal impact; the stated intent is fewer routine purchases requiring formal processing.

⚖️ Ordinances & enforcement

🏗️ For contractors & vendors

💰 Budget & payments

🔒 Closed session (3:30 PM)

🪑 Study session (4:30 PM) — no votes


Council Brief summaries are produced from official public records by our automated newsroom and reviewed before publication. Items are described as posted; the council may amend, continue, or remove items at the meeting. Spot an error? hello@councilbrief.com — we publish corrections.

Get the weekly brief for your city — free

One email a week: what your Orange County city is about to decide, before the vote. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Customize your watchlist (optional)