What the Los Alamitos Planning Commission considered
The Planning Commission/Subdivision Committee met Wednesday at 6:00 PM in the Council Chamber, 3191 Katella Ave. These are items from the posted agenda — official outcomes were not yet posted at publication, so nothing below is described as decided. Every item links to the official record.
Source: official agenda (PDF) · meeting page
The headline: a thin agenda with one public hearing — a conditional use permit that would allow a tattoo business in a 980-square-foot retail space at 10676 Los Alamitos Boulevard, in the General Commercial (C-G) zone. Staff recommended approval via Resolution No. 26-04. Any final commission decision can be appealed to the City Council within ten business days.
🏘️ Housing & zoning
- Public hearing — CUP 26-05, 10676 Los Alamitos Boulevard: a Conditional Use Permit for a "Personal Services, Restricted" (tattoo) business within a 980-square-foot existing retail store in a general commercial building, APN 242-245-01. Applicant: Kristopher Hipsher, American Retro. Under Los Alamitos Municipal Code Section 17.10.020, Table 2-04, this use requires a Planning Commission CUP in the C-G district. Staff recommended opening the hearing, taking testimony, and adopting Resolution No. 26-04 approving the permit. Item 6A
- Environmental review: staff found the project exempt from CEQA under Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 categorical exemption), citing no expansion of the building footprint, existing public services at the site, and no significant adverse effects on traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Notice was mailed to property owners and commercial tenants within 1,000 feet on August 12, 2026, posted at City Hall, and published in the Orange County Reporter the same day. The agenda lists no prior actions on the application. Item 6A
⚖️ Ordinances & enforcement
- California daylighting law: a staff report on implementation of AB 413, which — as the agenda quotes the state legislative information website — "would prohibit the stopping, standing, or parking of a vehicle within 20 feet of the vehicle's approach side of any unmarked or marked crosswalk or 15 feet of any crosswalk where a curb extension is present." The recommendation was to receive and file. Item 8A
🪑 Also on the agenda
- Approval of minutes from the July 22, 2026 regular meeting. The Discussion, Items from the Development Services Department, and Commissioner Reports sections list no specific business. Item 5A
- Appeal window: any final determination by the Planning Commission may be appealed in writing to the City Council through the Development Services Department within ten business days of the decision, with an appeal fee of $1,101.00 for residents or $2,349.00 for non-residents under Municipal Code Section 17.60 and Fee Resolution No. 2022-11. Item 11
Council Brief summaries are produced from official public records by our automated newsroom and reviewed before publication. Items are described as posted; the council may amend, continue, or remove items at the meeting. Spot an error? hello@councilbrief.com — we publish corrections.
Get the weekly brief for your city — free
One email a week: what your Orange County city is about to decide, before the vote. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.